How Applicant Tracking Systems Work in the Recruitment Process

Every hiring team has felt the pinch: piles of CVs, missed follow-ups, and top candidates slipping away while recruiters chase emails. That chaos shows up in Candidate Pipeline Management, where gaps in sourcing, CV screening, interview scheduling, and handoffs create holes in your talent pipeline. Want to stop losing people and speed hiring? This article lays out core functions like CV parsing, candidate tracking, workflow automation, job board integration, candidate relationship management, and recruitment analytics to explain how Applicant Tracking Systems Work in the Recruitment Process.

To help with that, Cercli's global HR system brings these tools together in a single, simple platform that cleans CVs, organises your candidate database, automates interview scheduling, and shows hiring metrics so you can act on what you learn.

Summary

• Applicant tracking systems are now the default: 75% of recruiters use some form of ATS, and 98% of Fortune 500 companies use an ATS. This means rule design directly shapes recruiting outcomes.
• ATS filtering is a significant source of leakage, with over 60% of job applications never seen by a human, indicating that aggressive keyword or format rules lead to false negatives.
• Treating an ATS as an isolated tool creates duplicated entries and audit exposure. At the same time, integrated flows can compress hire-to-pay timelines from days to hours, a benefit that becomes critical when hiring spans 48 countries.
• Practical rollout matters; run a staged configuration with a three-week pilot per role family and 2- to 4-week tuning cycles to prevent brittle screening rules from propagating and to preserve recruiter confidence.
• Use staged screening that pairs broad early filters with human review. This pattern supports throughput while aligning with LinkedIn's findings that a thoughtful ATS can reduce hiring time by up to 50%.
• Procurement and validation should include concrete tests: a sandbox migration with 500 anonymised records and five offer-to-pay scenarios, plus API field maps and SLAs, because these checks surface hidden migration and compliance risks.

This is where Cercli's global HR system fits in: it links ATS records directly to onboarding, payroll, and local regulatory workflows across 48 countries, compressing hire-to-pay timelines from days to hours.

What are Applicant Tracking Systems?

An applicant tracking system is recruiting software that manages the flow of candidates from job posting through hiring, centralising applications, notes, and basic screening to make recruitment repeatable and measurable. 

It coordinates: 

• Job distribution
• Stores applicant records
• Applies screening rules
• Creates an auditable pipeline 

Recruiters and hiring managers can work together.

What Recruitment Tasks Does An ATS Actually Handle?

An ATS posts vacancies to: 

• Multiple boards
• Captures CVs and supporting documents
• Stores structured applicant data 

You can search and report on it. It: 

• Documents interviewer feedback in one place
• Applies keyword and rule-based screening
• Produces reports that show where candidates stall

Treat it as the operational spine for recruitment, not just a CV locker.

Why Do ATS Integrations Matter For Growing Teams?

This pattern appears across small regional teams and enterprise HR departments: an ATS works well until downstream processes are manual. 

When hiring and payroll live in: 

• Separate silos
• Candidate data is retyped
• Compliance checks are repeated
• Handoffs create both delays and legal risk

That friction is most visible during cross-entity hiring, where local statutory requirements, contractor invoices, and payroll codes must be aligned.

What Breaks When Teams Treat An ATS as A Standalone Tool?

The practical risk is filtering, not just automation. According to SelectSoftware Reviews, 98% of Fortune 500 companies use an applicant tracking system, underscoring the prevalence of ATS logic among employers and how minor rule mismatches can have downstream effects. Also, the same article reports that over 60% of job applications are never seen by a human due to ATS filtering, which explains why overly aggressive keyword or format rules quietly discard viable candidates before anyone reviews them.

How Do People Typically Stumble With ATS Adoption?

When teams roll out an ATS without mapping hiring handoffs and reporting needs, two things happen: 

• Screening rules are copied from job to job and slowly drift out of step with fundamental hiring criteria, resulting in missed good hires. 
• Recruiters and hiring managers have to invent processes to fill gaps, which adds rework and slows time to hire. 

That learning curve is exhausting for teams under hiring pressure, and it often feels like progress regresses for the first few weeks as people adapt.

What’s A Practical Corrective Path For That Failure Mode?

If initial setup is the constraint, use a staged configuration. Start with a small number of well-scoped roles and tune screening rules for those jobs over two to four weeks, then expand. If compliance is the constraint, enforce required data fields and implement automated checks early to ensure candidate data is audit-ready. When scale is the issue, map integration touchpoints first, so every candidate record has a clear destination in payroll or contractor systems.

Connecting the Dots: How Integration Compresses the Hire-to-Pay Cycle

Most teams handle this by keeping recruitment, onboarding, and payroll as separate processes because it is familiar and reduces short-term risk. 

That approach works early on, but as you add countries, contractor types, and local statutory needs: 

• Manual handoffs fragment information
• Response times lengthen
• Audit exposure grows

Platforms like Cercli’s HRIS link ATS data straight into: 

• Onboarding
• Payroll for employees and contractors across 48 countries
• Local regulatory workflows

It compresses hire-to-pay timelines from days to hours while reducing manual transfers and compliance errors. Learn how Cercli integrates ATS, Payroll, and Compliance.

How Should Screening Rules Be Managed To Avoid False Negatives?

Think of screening rules as adjustable lenses, not fixed sieves. Use a combination of structured fields and human-reviewed stages, keep early-stage rules broad to capture diverse formats, and move deeper semantic checks to later stages where a human can validate borderline matches. That simple change reduces the risk that useful candidates are rejected due to formatting quirks or keyword mismatches.

From Analogy To Action: Mechanical Steps For ATS Reliability

An ATS functions like a port checkpoint. Good checkpoint design keeps cargo moving while ensuring inspections happen in the correct order; poor design returns whole containers for trivial paperwork errors. When inspection points are poorly placed, exports stop, and costs rise. The same is true for candidate flow when ATS rules and downstream payroll or compliance checks are misaligned. It’s frustrating when technology meant to speed hiring becomes the bottleneck. Still, the next piece of the puzzle explains precisely why the system behaves that way, and what mechanical steps make it reliable.

Related Reading

• How to Choose an Applicant Tracking System
• Saas Applicant Tracking System
• AI Candidate Screening
• HRIS vs ATS
• How to Improve Candidate Experience
• Applicant Tracking System Pricing
• Applicant Tracking System Benefits
• How to Track Open Positions

How Applicant Tracking Systems Work

Applicant tracking systems function as a data pipeline, converting unstructured candidate inputs into structured records, applying rules and human review, and routing those records into hiring workflows and downstream systems. 

They rely on: 

• Parsing
• Configurable scoring
• Staged review
• Integrations 

It keeps candidate movement predictable and traceable.

How Does An ATS Extract Usable Data From CVs?

CV parsing turns unstructured text into named fields, standardising job titles, dates, and contact details so you can search and report reliably. 

Poor parsing is where many programmes fail: 

• Non-standard layouts
• PDF images
• Multilingual CVs 

It produces gaps that compound as you scale. That parsing matter is why 75% of recruiters and talent managers use some form of applicant tracking software. Expect to tune parsers and field mappings repeatedly during rollout, not once and forget it.

How Do Screening Algorithms And Human Judgment Share The Work?

Screening should be a pipeline of widening and narrowing checks. Use broad, structured fields up front to catch diverse formats, then apply semantic scoring and a human review before knockout decisions. If you lock down keyword sieves early, you lose edge cases and diverse talent; if you leave everything manual, throughput collapses. In practice, staged filters reduce false negatives while keeping recruiters in the loop when nuance matters, which makes screening both efficient and fair.

How Do Integrations Change The Candidate Journey?

Most teams manage hiring as a separate process because it is familiar and requires no reorganisation. This works at a small scale, but when you expand across entities and contractor types, that separation creates: 

• Duplicated data entry
• Slower handoffs
• Compliance blindspots 

Platforms like Cercli with a global HR system link ATS records directly into: 

• Onboarding
• Payroll
• Local regulatory workflows

It compresses hire-to-pay timelines from days to hours while keeping an auditable trail.

What Operational Controls Stop An ATS from Becoming Brittle?

These factors are not optional as you grow across jurisdictions: 

• Role-based permissions
• Versioned interview kits
• Immutable audit logs
• Field-level consent

Also, treat localisation as a core requirement: 

• Time-zone-aware scheduling
• Right-to-work checks
• Bilingual communications 

It reduces candidate friction and legal risk. We see a familiar pattern, regional and enterprise alike, where teams skip data residency planning and then scramble when an audit or cross-border hire surfaces missing consent or retention rules; build those controls into your workflows from day one.

Why Does Enterprise Adoption Matter For How You Design Rules?

At scale, the system's behaviour shapes hiring outcomes. That is why 98% of Fortune 500 companies use an applicant tracking system. When the largest employers standardise on rules and integrations, operational expectations around auditability, reporting, and vendor support increase, and smaller organisations must decide whether to replicate those controls or opt for simpler trade-offs that suit speed and agility.

Surviving the Production Test: Key Features of an Effective ATS

Cercli is designed for companies in the Middle East that need a flexible, compliant, and reliable way to manage their workforce, whether teams are: 

• Local
• Remote
• Spread across multiple countries

As a regional solution, Cercli positions itself as a global HR system that reduces manual handoffs and keeps local payroll and regulatory workflows aligned. That solution looks convincing on paper until you see how rules, integrations, and human checkpoints actually collide in production. The following section explains what an adequate ATS must include to survive that test.

Key Features of an Effective Applicant Tracking System

An effective ATS bundles: 

• Precise channel control
• Candidate-friendly intake
• Measured screening
• Strict controls for data and uptime

Hiring moves faster without adding legal or operational risk. The following features are the practical elements you must check, tune, and measure if the system is to perform real work for a growing, multi-jurisdiction operation.

How Should Job Posts Be Distributed And Measured?

Make the job posting a managed campaign, not a one-off copy-and-paste. 

Look for feed controls that let you: 

• Version the posting by market
• Schedule refresh cadence
• Set geo and language targeting
• Attach UTM tags

Every applicant source is tracked back to a single metric. That lets you optimise spend by channel and spot which boards or social placements actually produce interviews. Treat posting feeds like paid media campaigns, with performance dashboards, so you stop throwing budget at low-yield channels.

What Makes An Application Form Useful For Both Candidate And Recruiter?

Design intake as progressive profiling, not an interrogation. 

Start with a short, mobile-friendly form that captures: 

• Core contact
• Eligibility
• One skill check

Surface deeper assessments only after the candidate clears the first pass. Support multiple file types, inline previews, and accessibility features so you don't lose applicants due to formatting quirks. Multilingual prompts and localised contact fields reduce dropouts, particularly for the diverse talent pool in the MENA region, and keeping the first screen under 90 seconds preserves completion rates.

How Do Filters Avoid Throwing Away Good Applicants?

Filters must be weighted and transparent, not binary traps. Combine structured fields with semantic search and adjustable weights, then surface borderline matches into a human validation queue. The most common failure mode is locking the knockout rules too early, which lets useful candidates fall through. Think of filters like fishing nets with changeable mesh, widen them for scarce roles, tighten them when you need throughput, and log every adjustment so you can audit false negatives later.

How Should Career Pages Work As Active Pipelines?

Your career page should be a search-first experience with: 

• Clear localisation
• Role tags
• Content modules 

It explains development pathways by location or entity. 

Make open roles: 

• Searchable by: 
  • Skill
  • Team
  • Office
• Show up-to-date hiring status
• Capture the source 

Its conversions remain traceable. Minor improvements here, such as a one-click apply on mobile, often double the candidate flow for passive searches.

How Do You Automate Candidate Communication Without Sounding Robotic?

Use branching templates with timing rules and channel preferences, including SMS or regional messaging apps, where appropriate. Each automated note should be instrumented to capture delivery and response metrics, so you can see whether messages are opened, ignored, or scheduled. Give candidates clear next steps in every message and an easy opt-out, because respectful automation reduces ghosting and protects your employer brand.

How Does Scheduling Stop Being A Calendar War?

Prefer interviewer pools and standardised interview slots over bespoke scheduling per vacancy. 

When conflicts arise, the ATS should: 

• Detect time zones
• Enforce buffer times
• Auto-assign alternate interviewers

That reduces back-and-forth and keeps candidate momentum. If you must, allow recruiters to reserve blocks and let candidates pick from those windows, which substantially reduces rescheduling cycles.

How Do You Deliver Helpful Feedback At Scale Without Legal Risk?

Standardise feedback with rubrics and short, actionable notes that avoid comparative or subjective language. Offer optional coaching points and track candidate satisfaction metrics, so rejected applicants still feel respected and remain open to future roles. Keep templates for refusal language that satisfy local legal requirements and reduce the chance of ambiguous phrasing that invites disputes.

What Exact Security And Reliability Controls Matter?

Require encryption at rest and in transit, role-based access, immutable audit logs, and documented DR tests with a defined recovery time objective. Verify data residency options for each country where you hire, and insist on a measurable uptime SLA. Enterprise expectations drive these controls to default requirements because the cost of a data breach or prolonged outage is both regulatory and reputational.

Hire-to-Pay Efficiency: Automating the Journey from Offer to First Payment

Most teams manage recruitment and payroll in separate tools because that is familiar and lowers short-term risk. Because hiring spans entities and contractor types, manual handoffs create duplicate entries, delayed payments, and compliance blind spots that surface during audits. 

Teams find that platforms which link ATS records straight into: 

• Onboarding
• Payroll
• Local regulatory workflows 

It compresses hire-to-pay timelines from days into hours while keeping a single auditable trail, reducing rework and legal exposure. Discover Cercli’s compliant, integrated HR platform.

What Practical Checks Should You Run During Rollout?

Run a three-week pilot per role family, measure interview conversion and time to schedule, and capture sample CVs that failed parsing so you can tune the parser rules. Track candidate source, drop-off point and time between stages, then iterate. This constraint-based approach, tuned on a small set of roles before scale, prevents brittle rules from propagating and preserves recruiter confidence.

Measuring What Matters: Proving the ATS's Impact on Hires and Payroll

When we map these features together, the result is measurable: 

• Faster time to interview
• Fewer format rejections
• Predictable audit trails 

It keeps legal teams calm. The tricky question, which most teams only notice later, is what you will measure to prove the ATS actually improved hires and payroll across your entities. That solution sounds complete until you examine whether an ATS actually changes hiring outcomes in practice.

Why Use an Applicant Tracking System to Hire Talent

An ATS is worth using because it turns recruitment from guesswork into a repeatable, measurable process that keeps hiring moving and preserves knowledge as you scale. 

It forces you to: 

• Measure outcomes
• Reduce manual friction
• Connect hiring decisions to payroll and compliance 

Offers actually turn into paid starts on time.

How Does An ATS Create Measurable Discipline?

Start by treating the ATS as your metrics engine, not just an inbox. 

Track: 

• Stage conversion rates
• Time in stage
• Source-to-interview ratios
• Hiring manager satisfaction

Tie those to cost metrics such as agency spend or time-to-productivity for new hires. Pattern-wise, teams that set a three-week tuning cycle for these metrics quickly identify the real blockers, because the data points where candidates stall become actionable tasks, not vague complaints.

What Behaviour Changes Help Adoption Stick?

Most teams handle new tooling by asking recruiters to “just use it” and then wonder why usage lags. 

When we run staged rollouts, the pattern is clear: 

• Pick two role families
• Enforce one shared workflow
• Train hiring managers for two hours

Iterate weekly. That constraint forces simple habits, prevents brittle rule sets from multiplying, and creates champions who keep the rest of the company honest about data quality.

Why is This a Governance Problem, Not A Tech Problem?

Manual handoffs work early because someone remembers the steps. As soon as you add entities, contractors, or countries, memory fails, and compliance risk rises. The familiar approach is spreadsheets and email sign-offs, which look cheap until an audit or missed payment exposes duplicated work and legal exposure. 

Solutions like platforms such as Cercli’s HRIS link ATS records into: 

• Onboarding
• Payroll across 48 countries
• Local regulatory workflows

It compresses hire-to-pay timelines from days to hours while producing auditable trails that reduce manual transfers and errors.

How Should Teams Treat Candidate Privacy And Data Residency?

Design retention and consent into the workflow from day one, not as an afterthought. 

Use: 

• Role-based access
• Field-level consent flags
• Clear retention policies per jurisdiction 

You can respond to subject access requests without scrambling. This is a regulatory and operational control, as having the correct consent and residency settings prevents costly rework when a candidate moves from applicant to employee status.

How Does Candidate Experience Change Hiring Outcomes?

It is exhausting when top candidates ghost you because you missed an interview window or sent a generic email at the wrong local time. Build short, respectful touchpoints, use the candidate’s preferred channel, and instrument every outgoing message so you can see opens and replies. That attention to cadence and tone preserves the employer brand and increases offer acceptance, ultimately reducing rework and speeding up time-to-productivity.

What Should You Measure To Prove An ATS Paid For Itself?

Beyond time-to-hire, follow hire-to-pay timelines, offer acceptance rate, hiring manager satisfaction, and the percentage of hires who pass first-month performance checks. Also track avoidable costs, such as agency fees and error-correction time, in payroll and compliance. When these measures move in concert, you are proving organisational impact, not just tech adoption; that is how recruitment becomes a predictable business capability.

Stop The Manual Hand-Offs: Automating Hire-To-Pay For Global Compliance

Most teams keep hiring and payroll separate because it feels safer and requires no organisational redesign. That approach works until a single cross-border hire forces repeated manual checks, which delays pay and adds legal risk. 

Teams find that platforms such as Cercli’s global HR system remove those manual touchpoints by: 

• Automating the handoffs
• Keeping compliance checks in place
• Cutting rework as you add countries
• Contractor types

Beyond Basic Tracking: Operational Expectations For Auditability And Vendor Support

SelectSoftware Reviews reports that 75% of recruiters and talent managers use some form of applicant tracking software, which shows how common ATS workflows have become and why process discipline matters when you scale. Likewise, the same article notes that 98% of Fortune 500 companies use an applicant tracking system, underscoring that operational expectations around auditability and vendor support increase as hiring complexity grows.

Global Ambitions, Local Compliance: Hr For The Expanding Mena Business

Cercli helps MENA businesses centralise hiring, onboarding, and payroll through a single, compliant platform designed for regional rules and cross-border teams, acting as a global HR system for organisations expanding across the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and the wider MENA region. For firms that need quick migrations, dedicated onboarding, and local support, Cercli provides operational continuity that prevents small process gaps from becoming legal headaches. Ready to simplify HR across the MENA region? Speak to a local specialist. That simple fix feels like the finish line until you realise that the choice you make here determines whether growth creates clarity or chaos.

Related Reading

• ATS Features
• Types of ATS Systems
• Best Applicant Tracking System UK
• Applicant Tracking System Functional Requirements
• Healthcare Applicant Tracking Systems
• Best Applicant Tracking Systems for Small Businesses
• Best Candidate Assessment Tools
• Applicant Tracking System Integration
• Best ATS for Small Recruitment Agencies
• Recruitment Management System UAE
• Recruiters use AI-based applicant Tracking Systems to

How to Choose the Right Applicant Tracking System for Your Organisation

Pick an ATS by mapping challenging requirements to vendor capabilities, then validate with a focused pilot and contract terms that limit migration and support risk. 

Treat selection as a systems decision, not a feature checklist: 

• You want predictable outputs
• Measurable gains
• A clear path for the data to flow into payroll and compliance

Who Must Sign Off, And What Permissions Matter?

Map decision makers early, with named approvers for security, legal, payroll, talent acquisition, and one or two hiring managers who will live with the system daily. 

Give each approver a short scoring sheet: 

• Data governance
• API readiness
• SLAs
• Localisation
• Change-management effort

That sheet serves as your tie-breaker when vendors appear functionally similar.

What Will You Measure To Prove The ATS Is Delivering?

Define three lead KPIs and three lag KPIs before you buy, then demand vendor reports that match those fields. 

Lead KPIs: 

• Source-to-interview ratio
• Scheduling cycles
• Candidate drop-off by stage

Lag KPIs: 

• Offer acceptance
• Time from offer to first pay
• Payroll error rate

Use realistic targets and benchmark against LinkedIn Pulse, “An ATS can reduce hiring time by up to 50%,” when setting stretch goals so your stakeholders expect measurable progress, not miracles.

How Will You Validate Integrations And Data Flows?

Require a signed integration readiness checklist before contract signing: includes: 

• API endpoints
• Field maps for name
• National ID, bank
• Tax codes per entity
• Webhook delivery tests
• A rollback plan

Ask vendors to run a sandbox migration with a defined dataset and acceptance criteria, for example, 500 anonymised records and five offer-to-pay scenarios, and insist on delivery proof before you switch live traffic.

How Should Pricing And Contract Terms Protect You?

Negotiate a total cost of ownership, not a headline licence fee. 

Insist on clarity for: 

• Migration fees
• Per-country add-ons
• Training hours
• Support tiers
• Service credits tied to uptime and response times

Include guaranteed data export in a machine-readable format and a defined exit window, so you own your historical records if you switch providers later.

What Does A Sensible Pilot Look Like?

Run an A/B pilot where half the roles follow the old process and half use the ATS, matched by role seniority and geography. Run this for four weeks or until each arm sees at least 20 applications, whichever comes later. 

Measure conversion: 

• At each stage
• Time to schedule
• Offer acceptance
• First-pay accuracy

Iterate rules only after you see consistent differences. That simple experimental design separates tool effects from seasonal or role-based noise.

How Will You Test Candidate Experience And Local Language Flows?

Create three short usability tests: 

• One for a mobile application
• One for scheduling in local time zones
• One for multilingual communications

Track a candidate's NPS and time-to-complete the form, and run a failure-case test, such as a Cyrillic CV or an image PDF, to see how parsing and support handle edge cases. Also, measure hiring manager effort, because a slick candidate flow is wasted if managers wrestle with the interface.

Go-Live Success: Why Local Support Trumps Feature Lists

Most teams negotiate seats and feature lists because they are familiar and perceived as low risk. That works until migration stalls and support is only during business hours in another time zone, leaving recruiters to bridge gaps with spreadsheets. 

Teams find that platforms such as Cercli’s HRIS, which offer: 

• Quick migrations
• Dedicated onboarding
• Real-time local support

Remove those hidden costs by shortening go-live time and protecting day-one hiring operations.

Which Legal And Compliance Checks Should Be Contractually Required?

Ask for documented data residency options and proof of encryption standards, role-based access controls, and audit logging that shows who changed what and when. Demand a runbook for regulatory incidents, and include a clause requiring periodic compliance drills or reports for the countries where you hire. This prevents the common surprise of having to retroactively fix retention and consent when a candidate becomes an employee.

How Do You Judge Vendor Support Quality Beyond Marketing Claims?

Score vendors on three concrete tests: 

1. Time to respond to a priority one ticket with a proposed remediation.
2. Availability of local language support.
3. Trial of dedicated onboarding where the vendor performs a sample migration under your supervision. 

Replace checklist-based optimism with direct measurement, and tie a portion of the onboarding fee to the successful delivery of those milestones.

Why Run A Procurement Scorecard And What Should It Include?

Use a weighted matrix where business continuity, data protection, and integration reliability carry more weight than bells and whistles. 

Include columns for: 

• Migration time
• Sandbox availability
• Documented APIs
• Local regulatory expertise
• Fixed costs for support

When scores are close, prefer the vendor that accepts time-boxed pilots and service credits over one that promises custom work without guarantees.

How Should You Prove ROI To Leadership After Go-Live?

Report monthly for the first quarter on the KPIs you defined, and include two financial metrics: 

• Cost per hire 
• Avoidable payroll rework hours converted to cost savings

Tie those to qualitative feedback from hiring managers and a simple case study showing a hire-to-pay improvement, so leadership sees both numbers and stories.

Measuring Quality: The Critical Final Test Before Signing the Contract

Set expectations for candidate quality improvement as well; many recruiters report better hire quality once processes stabilise, and you can benchmark against RippleHire Blog, “60% of recruiters report improved candidate quality with an ATS,” when you discuss outcomes with stakeholders. You will learn more in the pilot than in any demo; the right vendor survives that scrutiny with clean data exports, testable integrations, and clear commitments. That choice feels final until you discover one contract clause that quietly decides whether growth will be smooth or constantly reactive.

Book a Demo to Speak with Our Team about Our Global HR System

We're used to stitching recruitment, onboarding, and pay together with ad hoc processes because it feels lower risk, and that routine quietly costs as you scale: 

• Time
• Talent
• Exposure 

Platforms like Cercli enable teams in the Middle East to run local and global payroll, contractor payments, and workforce operations from a single HR system, with hands-on migration and regional support.  Book a demo to see how your candidate pipeline becomes dependable and compliant without late-night firefights.

Related Reading

• Top Recruiting Tools
• Greenhouse Competitors
• Enterprise Recruitment System
• Greenhouse vs Lever
• Bamboohr vs Rippling
• Bamboohr vs Trinet
• BambooHR vs Paylocity
• Bamboohr Alternatives
• Top Applicant Tracking Systems
• Workday Alternatives
• BambooHR vs Workday

‍